Dell is apparently putting hardware keyloggers in their laptops at the behest of the Department of Clownland Security,although when asked about it, they say “the intregrated service tag identifier is there for assisting customers in the event of lost or misplaced personal information” and hang up. the only thing i know for sure is that the guy who submitted a FOIA request for an explanation of why his new laptop had a device that can and is used to spy on terrorists (among other, less legal uses) got a reply that included the following statement from DHS: “the requested records are exempt from being disclosed under FOIA”… dude, i’m not getting a dell!!! (and here’s evidence that the whole thing is a hoax, but i’m not getting a dell anyway, i’m getting a mac, if i’m getting a computer at all)

Hayden Insists NSA Surveillance Is Legal
CIA Nominee Gen. Michael Hayden Insists NSA Warrantless Surveillance Program Is Legal
May 18, 2006

WASHINGTON — CIA nominee Gen. Michael Hayden insisted on Thursday that the Bush administration’s warrantless surveillance program was legal and that it was designed to ensnare terrorists not spy on ordinary people.

“Clearly the privacy of American citizens is a concern constantly,” the four-star Air Force general told the Senate Intelligence Committee at his confirmation hearing. “We always balance privacy and security.”

Hayden was peppered by as many questions about the National Security Agency, the super-secret agency that he headed from 1999-2005, as about his visions for the CIA.

Senators grilled him on the NSA’s eavesdropping without warrants on conversations and e-mails believed by the government to involve terrorism suspects, and reports of the tracking of millions of phone calls made and received by ordinary Americans.

After the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, President Bush decided that more anti-terrorism surveillance was necessary than the NSA had been doing, said Hayden.

Hayden said he decided to go ahead with the then-covert surveillance program, which has been confirmed by Bush, believing it to be legal and necessary.

“When I had to make this personal decision in October 2001 … the math was pretty straightforward. I could not not do this,” Hayden said.

He said the surveillance program used a “probable cause” standard that made it unlikely that information about average Americans would be scrutinized.

But he declined to openly discuss reports that the NSA was engaged in even broader surveillance, including a story in USA Today that the NSA has been secretly collecting phone-call records of tens of millions of U.S. citizens.

Under questioning from Democratic Sen. Carl Levin of Michigan, Hayden said he would only talk about the part of the program the president had confirmed.

“Is that the whole program?” asked Levin.

“I’m not at liberty to talk about that in open session,” Hayden said. A closed-door session was planned for later in the day.

Hayden was asked about reported friction between him and Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld over how the NSA and other intelligence agencies would work with the Pentagon, which has the lion’s share of intelligence dollars.

Had they disagreed, he was asked by Levin? “Yes sir,” said Hayden.

Some critics have suggested that Hayden, 61, who remains an active general, is too closely aligned with the Pentagon to objectively run the civilian CIA.

Hayden declined to answer a string of questions by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., saying he would answer them later in a closed-door session.

They included whether he believed that “waterboarding,” in which prisoners are strapped to a plank and dunked in water until nearly drowning, was an acceptable form of interrogation. He also declined to say publicly how long he believed the United States could hold terror suspects without a trial.

“He didn’t answer any of them,” Feinstein said into an open mike as the hearing recessed for lunch.

Meanwhile, White House spokesman Tony Snow expressed the president’s full confidence in Hayden. “The guy’s got a record of trying to take on big reform tasks and carrying them out,” Snow told reporters.

Hayden acknowledged a series of intelligence failures in the run-up to the U.S. decision to invade Iraq and promised to take steps to guard against a repeat of such errors.

“We just took too much for granted. We didn’t challenge our basic assumptions,” he told the Senate Intelligence Committee at his confirmation hearing.

He said that since launching the surveillance program a month after the terror attacks, targeting decisions have been made by NSA experts on al-Qaida.

Asked by Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo., whether a NSA analyst could intentionally look at information unrelated to suspected terrorist activity, Hayden said, “I don’t know how that could survive.”

Committee Chairman Sen. Pat Roberts of Kansas complained about the CIA’s performance on Iraq. While “nobody bats 1,000 in the intelligence world,” Roberts cited “a terribly flawed trade craft” in the CIA’s intelligence suggesting the presence of weapons of mass destruction there.

At the same time, Roberts complained that the discussion among lawmakers had not been over Hayden’s long intelligence-services resume “but rather the debate is focused almost entirely” on controversy over NSA surveillance and eavesdropping programs.

Hayden, as expected, drew the most fire from Democratic members. “I now have a difficult time with your credibility,” said Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore.

In an opening statement, Hayden said that intelligence-gathering has become “the football in American political discourse” since the terror attacks of Sept. 11.

He said the embattled agency “must be transformed, without slowing the high tempo under which it already operates, to counter today’s threats.”

“Yes, there have been failures, but there have also been many great successes,” Hayden said.

If confirmed, “I would reaffirm the CIA’s proud culture of risk-taking,” said Hayden, who was selected by President Bush to succeed Porter Goss, who was forced out after serving for 18 months.

Hayden’s hearing before the Intelligence Committee was much different than a year ago, when the panel approved him unanimously to be the nation’s first principal deputy director of national intelligence.

Bush chose Hayden as CIA director-nominee after consultation with Hayden’s current boss, National Intelligence Director John Negroponte. Goss announced his retirement earlier this month after disputes with Hayden and Negroponte about the CIA’s direction.

Preacher: God told him about storms, tsunami
Robertson says warning was for this year; tsunami might hit Northwest

VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. – In another in a series of notable pronouncements, religious broadcaster Pat Robertson says God told him storms and possibly a tsunami will hit America’s coastline this year.

Robertson has made the predictions at least four times in the past two weeks on his news-and-talk television show “The 700 Club” on the Christian Broadcasting Network, which he founded.

Robertson said the revelations about this year’s weather came to him during his annual personal prayer retreat in January.

“If I heard the Lord right about 2006, the coasts of America will be lashed by storms,” Robertson said May 8. On Wednesday, he added, “There well may be something as bad as a tsunami in the Pacific Northwest.”

Robertson has come under intense criticism in recent months for suggesting that American agents should assassinate Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and that Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s stroke was divine retribution for Israel’s pullout from the Gaza Strip.

not to mention blaming 9/11 on gays and "liberal" groups”

7 thoughts on “496”

  1. hmm…

    odd indeed… but not entirely unexpected.

    it doesn’t look to me (admittedly i’ve never even seen a Dell 600m laptop, much less gone digging around inside of it) like the keyghost device would be too bulky to fit inside the case, but maybe i’m mistaken about the relative sizes of both the laptop and the keyghost.

    the guy who posted the keylogging incident doesn’t post his name or any way to get in touch with him, and the review of keyghost also has the same “broken” links, which lead me to believe that the DHS, perhaps, pestered the manufacturers of those chips to remove potentially embarrassing information from the web, but the thing with file number 20050112 – 20050119 is beyond simple explanation

    the acronym used in the body of the hoax letter should be FOIPA

    for people who knew about the Freedom Of Information Act before 9/11, (like myself and, apparently, whoever posted the keylogging article) it’s probably still FOIA – the PA part of it didn’t get added until after 9/11.

  2. well, I posted the keylogging one in a 25,000 member community I know since the images are half-inched and 2 out of 3 important links to hardware are broken and we got a decent investigation going with this result from someone nameless :


    The images are stolen off this site.


    The technology supposedly used is outdated, obvious and too bulky to fit inside most laptops I have worked on.

    The document references file number File Number: 20050112 – 20050119, which refers, white house briefs regarding the possible leaked identity to a reporter(s) of an undercover CIA agent Valerie Plame.


    Department of Homeland Security
    United States Secret Service
    Washington, D.C. 20223

    Freedom of Information and Privacy Acts Branch
    245 Murray Drive
    Building 410
    Washington, D.C. 20223

    The Honorable Louise Slaughter
    Ranking Member
    Committee on Rules
    U.S. House of Representatives
    Washington, DC 20515
    File Number: 20050112 – 20050119

    Dear Ms. Slaughter:

    Thank you for submitting your Freedom of Information/Privacy Acts (FOI/PA) requests, received by the United States Secret Service, on March 8, 2005, for information pertaining to as follows:

    File No. 20050112 – Pertaining to all records setting forth or discussing the standards the Secret Service or the White House impose on those who are granted access to the President and the White House Briefing Room.

    File No. 20050113 – Pertaining to all records setting forth or discussing policies, procedures or guidelines discussing clearance into the White House Briefing Room, as it was applied to Mr. Guckert.

    File No. 20050114 – Pertaining to the individual or agency responsible for requesting that the Secret Service conduct a security clearance for individuals or members of the media who wish to enter the White House Briefing Room.

    File No. 20050115 – Pertaining to records relating to security qualifications for granting “permanent” White House press corps credentials and how they differ from those of a simple day pass.

    File No. 20050116 – Pertaining to all records indicating or discussing whether and to what extent someone who is cleared for a daily pass is required to be cleared each time they return on subsequent visits to the White House Briefing Room, as in the case of Mr. Guckert.

    File No. 20050117 – Pertaining to all records relating to how many daily passes are issued for White House briefings and Presidential press conferences at one time.

    File No. 20050118 – Pertaining to all records setting forth or discussing who has the authority, if at all, to exempt an individual or member of the media from security clearance by the Secret Service in order to gain access to the White House Briefing Room.

    File No. 20050119 – Pertaining to all records indicating how many times and on what days Mr. Guckert was cleared by the Secret Service into the White House, and at whose request; all records indicating what types of passes were issued for Mr. Guckert; all records of communication between the Secret Service and Mr. Guckert.

    We wish to inform you that a search for files responsive to your requests is being conducted. When the results of the search are known, you will be notified.

    Please use the file numbers indicated above in all future correspondence with this office.

    We assure you that the search will be conducted as expeditiously as possible.


    Kathy J. Lyerly, SAIC, Freedom of Information & Privacy Acts Officer

    I also think the acronym used in the body of the hoax letter should be FOIPA?

  3. I think that Robertson is just another extremist radical cleric that should be investigated by the Feds like the other radical clerics. Seems only fair, and would make for some damn entertaining media watching.

  4. Pat, really, you’re starting to sound like you should be on late-night with Miss Cleo.

    Keyloggers in computers that the company doesn’t have to comply with FOIA requests for? Sketchy and not cool. Almost like what we’ve heard about the NSA program, except this time we have a concerete example.

  5. “If I heard the Lord right about 2006, the coasts of America will be lashed by storms,” Robertson said May 8. On Wednesday, he added, “There well may be something as bad as a tsunami in the Pacific Northwest.”

    That’s ok. We have “tsunami warning zones”, as anyone who’s ever travelled the coast highway can tell you.

    I just loved those signs. Like, you know you’re driving in a tsunami danger zone, so if you look off westward and see a towering wall of water you can be sure of just how fucked you are… unless… you get to the next “end of tsunami danger area” sign before the thing hits.

    What a hoot.

    But then, since Pat “my brain died years ago” Robertson said it, we can be pretty sure we’ll be tsunami-free in ought-six.


Comments are closed.